<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A great Chapter 4 doesn&#8217;t matter if Chapters 1-3 suck</title>
	<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/01/24/a-great-chapter-4-doesnt-matter-if-chapters-1-3-suck/</link>
	<description>Working hard to improve the signal-to-noise ratio</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dharmesh Shah</title>
		<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/01/24/a-great-chapter-4-doesnt-matter-if-chapters-1-3-suck/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Dharmesh Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.payne.org/2008/01/24/a-great-chapter-4-doesnt-matter-if-chapters-1-3-suck/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Could not agree more.

I call this "premature scalculation":

http://onstartups.com/home/tabid/3339/bid/3055/Startups-and-The-Problem-Of-Premature-Scalaculation.aspx

But, your "now problems" vs. "future problems" is a better and higher-level abstraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not agree more.</p>
<p>I call this &#8220;premature scalculation&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://onstartups.com/home/tabid/3339/bid/3055/Startups-and-The-Problem-Of-Premature-Scalaculation.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://onstartups.com/home/tabid/3339/bid/3055/Startups-and-The-Problem-Of-Premature-Scalaculation.aspx</a></p>
<p>But, your &#8220;now problems&#8221; vs. &#8220;future problems&#8221; is a better and higher-level abstraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
