Comments on: Safari on Windows (beta) – fast, fast http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/ Working to improve the signal-to-noise ratio Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:42:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: payne http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-352 payne Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:43:30 +0000 http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-352 I agree -- I think the Webkit guys are onto something. I agree — I think the Webkit guys are onto something.

]]> By: Dharmesh Shah http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-351 Dharmesh Shah Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:55:10 +0000 http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-351 How is the memory consumption? My big issue with FireFox is not speed, but the amount of memory it consumes. I regularly have FireFox take up 1G+ on my 4G machine. How is the memory consumption?

My big issue with FireFox is not speed, but the amount of memory it consumes. I regularly have FireFox take up 1G+ on my 4G machine.

]]> By: Antonio http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-350 Antonio Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:07:03 +0000 http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-350 Andy, Try FFox 3. Thought FFox2 is a pig on, 3 is quite speedy. Tho I have to say, I think Webkit will be the one renderer that will rule them all. Dave Hyatt & team are doing a great job avoiding mistakes of the past... Andy,

Try FFox 3. Thought FFox2 is a pig on, 3 is quite speedy.

Tho I have to say, I think Webkit will be the one renderer that will rule them all. Dave Hyatt & team are doing a great job avoiding mistakes of the past…

]]>