<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari on Windows (beta) - fast, fast</title>
	<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/</link>
	<description>Working hard to improve the signal-to-noise ratio</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: payne</title>
		<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I agree -- I think the Webkit guys are onto something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8212; I think the Webkit guys are onto something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dharmesh Shah</title>
		<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Dharmesh Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>How is the memory consumption?

My big issue with FireFox is not speed, but the amount of memory it consumes.  I regularly have FireFox take up 1G+ on my 4G machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the memory consumption?</p>
<p>My big issue with FireFox is not speed, but the amount of memory it consumes.  I regularly have FireFox take up 1G+ on my 4G machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.payne.org/2008/03/01/safari-on-windows-beta-fast-fast/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Try FFox 3. Thought FFox2 is a pig on, 3 is quite speedy.

Tho I have to say, I think Webkit will be the one renderer that will rule them all. Dave Hyatt &#38; team are doing a great job avoiding mistakes of the past...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Try FFox 3. Thought FFox2 is a pig on, 3 is quite speedy.</p>
<p>Tho I have to say, I think Webkit will be the one renderer that will rule them all. Dave Hyatt &amp; team are doing a great job avoiding mistakes of the past&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
