<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s obsessed about your product details?</title>
	<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/04/01/whos-obsessed-about-your-product-details/</link>
	<description>Working hard to improve the signal-to-noise ratio</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: brian halligan</title>
		<link>http://blog.payne.org/2008/04/01/whos-obsessed-about-your-product-details/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>brian halligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.payne.org/2008/04/01/whos-obsessed-about-your-product-details/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>i think yur right.

you can feel when you use apple's products that someone over there is obsessed about simplicity, elegance, ui, and design.

i think committee's tend to give you a lowest common denominator   which can work in some scenarios, but is probably not the right way to go if you are doing innovative stuff in fast moving waters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think yur right.</p>
<p>you can feel when you use apple&#8217;s products that someone over there is obsessed about simplicity, elegance, ui, and design.</p>
<p>i think committee&#8217;s tend to give you a lowest common denominator   which can work in some scenarios, but is probably not the right way to go if you are doing innovative stuff in fast moving waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
